What is democracy, and is there a better alternative?
4 stars based on
After a successful transition from communism to democracy, Hungary jede option democracy Poland are slowly drifting towards a Russian-style authoritarian jede option democracy type of regime, and away from European core values. A trend that is affecting the whole region. This new legislation allowing the government to expel the Central European University CEU from Hungary is like an X-ray image of jede option democracy hybrid regime — a democracy jede option democracy towards authoritarianism.
Moreover, it is not an isolated case but already a regional trend. The alarming Nations in Transit report by Freedom House found that, with regards to democratic institutions and values, more countries were on the decline rather than an upswing.
At the end of the day, it is not so new to observe a democratic decline. But it is surprising to find that the most prominent success stories of the democratic transition — Hungary and Poland — are turning their back on their past achievements and moving towards a hybrid regime.
CEU is perhaps the only university in the region jede option democracy ranked in numerous world and European university reviews. It was founded by George Soros who registered it in New York and first accredited it in Prague inand shortly after, moved the institution to Hungary.
Dozens of Nobel-prize winners, hundreds of research institutes and even the German president decided to speak out against Lex-CEU. Yet, the law was adopted just five days after initiating the legislative proposal — only one amendment was attached which allowed for a special arrangement for the CEU providing it is agreed upon by both hosting governments, the USA and Hungary. Attacking one of the best higher education institutions in Central Europe carries more significance than the fact of the attack itself; it is a real portrait of the nature of a hybrid regime that tolerates less and less open debate and free inquiry.
This is not only about Mr. It is about eroding the system of checks and balances, restricting horizontal accountability and strengthening corruption.
Democratic institutions do exist in Hungary, but they barely work. Their role as a check on those in power has been gradually restricted since The National Assembly operates as a government-dominated law factory and the national government has either weakened autonomy or taken control of every institution that could in some way keep its power in check.
The goal of the Fidesz government is to eliminate any existing checks on its power with the continuous restriction jede option democracy democracy. The hybrid regime in Hungary can be categorised as a kind of jede option democracy authoritarianism that was researched by Steven Levitsky and Lucan A. Way, which only maintains the illusion of democratic competition. Moreover, this procedure is not appropriate for effective intervention, just like we have seen it in the case of Poland.
Otherwise, tolerating a hybrid regime could lead to an even more dangerous precedent in the CEE region that is already overshadowed by backsliding democracies. This article is published in association with Jede option democracy Insight. Factual or translation error?
Wojciech Przybylski Edit Zgut.